Tag Archives: xen

Docker vs LXC/Ansible?


Why this question?

During last DevOPS meetup @GrzegorzNosek asked very good question – why should one use Docker instead of pure LXC/Ansible?

Honestly I’ve been trying to answer myself this question for a while. I did in some part (included this in my talk I gave during that meetup: http://www.slideshare.net/d0cent/docker-rhel); while it’s about developers running development envs Docker is just so much easier to use.

But how should I explain using Docker for myself? I’m sysadmin and I love low-level – so LXC for me is just natural way of doing things :)

Your face, your ass – what’s the difference?

(If you feel embarassed / disgusted somehow with this header please rewind 18 years and remember that: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Duke_Nukem)

One thing you should know about me – I’m contributing to FedoraProject; lately I’ve been poking around Fedora-Dockerfiles project (https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/dockerfiles.git/) – I’m doing it for fun and also I wanted to learn more about Docker as I’m running some Open-Source projects with friends and had to find a easy way for them to rollup own development envs. Docker is the answer in this case.

So – currently I’m using Docker to prepare dev-envs for guys who knows nothing about DevOPS / SysOPping; writing Dockerfiles is so much fun (and sometimes so big hell :) ). And LXC? Together with Ansible I’m managing some servers’ resources (like VPN, DNS, some webservices etc). It’s also fun, it’s fast, rather reliable and it makes things so much easy to live with.

So any winners here?

But still – for me as guy who use rather fdisk than gparted (or virsh than virt-manager ;) ) Docker is not the case for managing services. And honestly I’m still looking for an answer for the question from subject of this blogpost. For now after couple of weeks poking around Docker (and months with LXC) I can tell this one obvious thing that when You know LXC than Docker is just so easy (e.g. running some daemons inside spartan-like Docker images can be a tough fight whe some libs or dependencies are missing). Also creating and running Dockerfiles is very easy – just like creating Ansible playbooks.

I think that I’m gonna do this one thing that I did couple of years ago when XEN and KVM were running shoulder to shoulder in the FOSS full-virt race. I’m just gonna use them both – Docker and LXC and see how things will develop. Docker is very great and easy to manage apps only (so Continuous Development with Docker is killing feature) and I’ll LXC/Ansible within some basic services (GitLab, DNS, VPN etc). But for more fun – I’m gonna keep both tracks, so e.g. when deploying GitLab within LXC I’ll create also Dockerfile for this.

This way I think that I will have a really good answer in just a couple of weeks and this should be nice subject for some conference talk?

Follow my GitHub account (or even better – Twitter) – I’ll post there updates about new playbooks and Dockerfiles.

XEN and KVM on 64-bit ARMs

So it’s here-KVM&XEN for 64-bit ARMs: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQwMDY

And life will be much easier :)

KVM – libvirt-guests – autostart / shutdown / pause

Some time ago while using XEN we had our own scripts we used during shutdown / start host machine. Those scripts were responsible for auto – saving and auto – resuming VMs. In KVM we no longer use our own scripts – we use libvirt-guests service instead. In RHEL/CentOS You’ll find init script for this service in  /etc/rc.d/init.d/libvirt-guests. If You want to do some changes in this service’s configuration do that in /etc/sysconfig/libvirt-guests instead of init script. If You installed KVM env using defaults You’ll be interested only in following params:

Using above config Your VMs would be auto – paused while system enters runlevel 0/6 (so shutdown or reboot). When host comes back (“back” means runlevels in which libvirt-guests is configured) Your VMs will be resumed.

Order of stopping / starting VMs is tricky – I found this discussion interesting: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-April/msg00819.html